Core i3-1115GRE
VS
Atom C3758

Core i3-1115GRE vs Atom C3758

Intel

Core i3-1115GRE

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Atom C3758

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-1115GRE is positioned at rank 1009 and the Atom C3758 is on rank 585, so the Atom C3758 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-1115GRE

#996
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2162%
#997
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2130%
#998
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1956%
#999
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1947%
#1000
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1929%
#1002
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1863%
#1003
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1786%
#1004
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1783%
#1005
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1735%
#1008
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
100%
#1010
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1011
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1012
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
98%
#1013
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
97%
#1014
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
97%
#1016
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1017
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1019
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1020
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
94%
#1021
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
#1022
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3758

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9008%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1701%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1511%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1167%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
99%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
98%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
96%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
96%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
95%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
94%
#585
Atom C3758
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
98%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
96%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-1115GRE leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom C3758 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-1115GREAtom C3758
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($480)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-1115GREAtom C3758
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($480)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1115GRE and Atom C3758

Intel

Core i3-1115GRE

The Core i3-1115GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 4,588 points. Launch price was $338.

Intel

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115GRE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3758 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3758 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115GRE versus 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 — a 55.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115GRE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-1115GRE uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Atom C3758 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115GRE scores 4,588 against the Atom C3758's 4,614 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom C3758. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,175 vs 400, a 98.4% lead for the Core i3-1115GRE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,233 vs 2,400 (7.2% advantage for the Atom C3758). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115GRE vs 16 MB on the Atom C3758.

FeatureCore i3-1115GREAtom C3758
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+77%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
16 MB+167%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
16 MB+1180%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
4,588
4,614
Geekbench 6 Single
1,175+194%
400
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,233
2,400+7%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115GRE uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Atom C3758 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1115GRE) vs 16 (Atom C3758) — the Atom C3758 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i3-1115GRE) and SoC (Atom C3758).

FeatureCore i3-1115GREAtom C3758
Socket
FCBGA1449
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
256 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i3-1115GRE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-1115GRE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758). The Core i3-1115GRE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded.

FeatureCore i3-1115GREAtom C3758
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server/Embedded