Core i3-13100T vs Core Ultra 7 164U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100T vs Core Ultra 7 164U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100T vs Core Ultra 7 164U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100T

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 164U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 164U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 164U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 7 164U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc, while Core i3-13100T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,625 vs 12,798).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100T better than Core Ultra 7 164U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 164U is ahead with a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100T pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100T is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core Ultra 7 164U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (95.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 164U is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i3-13100T vs Core Ultra 7 164U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100T

The Core i3-13100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,798 points. Launch price was $134.

Core Ultra 7 164U

The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 164U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-13100T versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i3-13100T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 164U uses Meteor Lake-U (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100T scores 12,798 against the Core Ultra 7 164U's 12,625 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-13100T. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-13100T	Core Ultra 7 164U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 14+200%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.8 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+127%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Meteor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark	12,798+1%	12,625
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,766
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,131
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,973

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 164U uses FCBGA2551 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-13100T	Core Ultra 7 164U
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2551
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR5x-6400
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-13100T) / VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U). The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Core i3-13100T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.