Core i3-2377M
VS
Atom C3508

Core i3-2377M vs Atom C3508

Intel

Core i3-2377M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Atom C3508

4 Cores4 Thrd11.25 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2377M is positioned at rank 1151 and the Atom C3508 is on rank 409, so the Atom C3508 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2377M

#1139
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3965%
#1140
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3907%
#1141
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3586%
#1142
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3570%
#1143
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3538%
#1145
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3416%
#1146
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3276%
#1147
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3270%
#1148
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3182%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
99%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
98%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
97%
#1158
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
96%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
93%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
92%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5675%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
95%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
952%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
735%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
98%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
96%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
95%
#409
Atom C3508
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3508 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-2377MAtom C3508
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-2377M (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-2377MAtom C3508
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2377M and Atom C3508

Intel

Core i3-2377M

The Core i3-2377M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Atom C3508

The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2377M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3508 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3508 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2377M versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Atom C3508 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-2377M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom C3508 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2377M scores 1,850 against the Atom C3508's 1,831 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-2377M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2377M vs 8 MB on the Atom C3508.

FeatureCore i3-2377MAtom C3508
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
1.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
1.6 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
8 MB+167%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8 MB+3100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
1,850+1%
1,831
Geekbench 6 Single
238
Geekbench 6 Multi
546
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2377M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom C3508 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2377M versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 — the Atom C3508 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-2377M) vs 12 (Atom C3508) — the Core i3-2377M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1023 (Core i3-2377M) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508).

FeatureCore i3-2377MAtom C3508
Socket
BGA1023
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-1866+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
256 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-2377M) / not specified (Atom C3508). The Core i3-2377M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Atom C3508 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-2377MAtom C3508
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d