Core i3-2377M vs Turion II M500

Core i3-2377M vs Turion II M500 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-2377M

2 / 4

1,850

0.0%

1,865

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2377M vs Turion II M500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2377M vs Turion II M500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2377M

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Turion II M500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion II M500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,850 vs 1,865).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Turion II M500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Turion II M500

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2377M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II M500 better than Core i3-2377M?

Yes. Turion II M500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II M500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II M500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II M500 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion II M500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-2377M only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2377M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-2377M vs Turion II M500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2377M

The Core i3-2377M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $250.

Turion II M500

The Turion II M500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-2377M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II M500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2377M versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion II M500 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Turion II M500. The Core i3-2377M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion II M500 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2377M scores 1,850 against the Turion II M500's 1,865 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion II M500.

Feature	Core i3-2377M	Turion II M500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.2 GHz+47%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	1,850	1,865
Geekbench 6 Single	238	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	546	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2377M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II M500 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-2377M	Turion II M500
Socket	BGA1023	S1g3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-2377M) / not specified (Turion II M500). The Core i3-2377M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion II M500 requires a dedicated GPU.