Core i3-2377M
VS
Core i7-740QM

Core i3-2377M vs Core i7-740QM

Intel

Core i3-2377M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-740QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2377M is positioned at rank 1151 and the Core i7-740QM is on rank 1209, so the Core i3-2377M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2377M

#1139
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3965%
#1140
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3907%
#1141
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3586%
#1142
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3570%
#1143
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3538%
#1145
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3416%
#1146
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3276%
#1147
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3270%
#1148
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3182%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
99%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
98%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
97%
#1158
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
96%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
93%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
92%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-740QM

#1197
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6025%
#1198
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5936%
#1199
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5450%
#1200
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5425%
#1201
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5375%
#1203
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5191%
#1204
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4977%
#1205
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4969%
#1206
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4836%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
98%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
96%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
94%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
93%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
91%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
91%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
86%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
84%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-740QM leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-2377M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($250)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-2377M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 34% cheaper ($250 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+52%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($250)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2377M and Core i7-740QM

Intel

Core i3-2377M

The Core i3-2377M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core i7-740QM

The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2377M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-740QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-740QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2377M versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-740QM (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Core i3-2377M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-740QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2377M scores 1,850 against the Core i7-740QM's 1,842 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-2377M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2377M vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.93 GHz+95%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
1.73 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,850
1,842
Geekbench 6 Single
238
Geekbench 6 Multi
546
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2377M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-740QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2377M versus 1333 on the Core i7-740QM — the Core i7-740QM supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2377M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1023 (Core i3-2377M) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-740QM).

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Socket
BGA1023
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+209715100%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-2377M) vs true (Core i7-740QM). The Core i3-2377M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-740QM requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-740QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-2377M launched at $250 MSRP, while the Core i7-740QM debuted at $378.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
MSRP
$250-34%
$378
Release Date
2012
2010