Core i3-2377M vs Core i7-740QM

Intel

Core i3-2377M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-740QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-2377M vs Core i7-740QM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2377M vs Core i7-740QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2377M vs Core i7-740QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2377M

2012

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $128 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 51.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Draws 17W instead of 45W, a 28W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i7-740QM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i7-740QM

2010

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,842 vs 1,850).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 164.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 17W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2377M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2377M better than Core i7-740QM?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-740QM is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2377M pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-740QM also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2377M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-2377M is the better buy right now. Core i3-2377M comes in $128 cheaper on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-740QM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.9% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 4.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-2377M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2377M vs Core i7-740QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-2377M

The Core i3-2377M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core i7-740QM

The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2377M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-740QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-740QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2377M versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-740QM (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Core i3-2377M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-740QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2377M scores 1,850 against the Core i7-740QM's 1,842 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-2377M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2377M vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.93 GHz+95%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
1.73 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,850
1,842
Geekbench 6 Single
238
Geekbench 6 Multi
546
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2377M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-740QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i3-2377M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1023 (Core i3-2377M) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-740QM).

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Socket
BGA1023
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-2377M) vs true (Core i7-740QM). The Core i3-2377M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-740QM requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-740QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-2377M was priced at $250, while the Core i7-740QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($250 vs $378), Core i3-2377M was $128 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-2377M delivers 7.4 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-740QM — making the Core i3-2377M the 41.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore i7-740QM
MSRP
$250-34%
$378
Performance per Dollar
7.4+51%
4.9
Release Date
2012
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.