Core i3-2377M
VS
Core 2 Duo T7400

Core i3-2377M vs Core 2 Duo T7400

Intel

Core i3-2377M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7400

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2377M is positioned at rank 1151 and the Core 2 Duo T7400 is on rank 1027, so the Core 2 Duo T7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2377M

#1139
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3965%
#1140
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3907%
#1141
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3586%
#1142
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3570%
#1143
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3538%
#1145
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3416%
#1146
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3276%
#1147
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3270%
#1148
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3182%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
99%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
98%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
97%
#1158
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
96%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
93%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
92%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7400

#1015
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2364%
#1016
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2330%
#1017
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2139%
#1018
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2129%
#1019
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2109%
#1021
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2037%
#1022
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1953%
#1023
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1950%
#1024
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1898%
#1027
Core 2 Duo T7400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-2377M (2012) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-2377MCore 2 Duo T7400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7400 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-2377MCore 2 Duo T7400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2377M and Core 2 Duo T7400

Intel

Core i3-2377M

The Core i3-2377M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7400

The Core 2 Duo T7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,861 points. Launch price was $286.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2377M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo T7400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2377M versus 2.16 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7400 — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7400 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). The Core i3-2377M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7400 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2377M scores 1,850 against the Core 2 Duo T7400's 1,861 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 238 vs 310, a 26.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 546 vs 550 (0.7% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7400). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2377M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7400.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore 2 Duo T7400
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.16 GHz+44%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.16 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,850
1,861
Geekbench 6 Single
238
310+30%
Geekbench 6 Multi
546
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2377M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2377M versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7400 — the Core i3-2377M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2377M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1023 (Core i3-2377M) and 945GT,GME965 (Core 2 Duo T7400).

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore 2 Duo T7400
Socket
BGA1023
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-2377M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7400). The Core i3-2377M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo T7400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7400 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeatureCore i3-2377MCore 2 Duo T7400
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Laptop