Core i3-3220T
VS
Xeon X6550

Core i3-3220T vs Xeon X6550

Intel

Core i3-3220T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon X6550

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3220T is positioned at rank 939 and the Xeon X6550 is on rank 879, so the Xeon X6550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3220T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23777%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22467%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16313%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4914%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3893%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3405%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1950%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1925%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1753%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1753%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1733%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1686%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1663%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1656%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1641%
#939
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
100%
#940
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
100%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#943
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
99%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#948
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
96%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
96%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
96%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X6550

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
21469%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4054%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3601%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2782%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
100%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
99%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
98%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
98%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
96%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
96%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
95%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
95%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
94%
#879
Xeon X6550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Xeon E5-2430L
MSRP: $551|Avg: $250
99%
#886
Xeon X3460
MSRP: $316|Avg: $25
97%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X6550 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i3-3220TXeon X6550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($146)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3220T ($146), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($146 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i3-3220TXeon X6550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($146)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3220T and Xeon X6550

Intel

Core i3-3220T

The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

Intel

Xeon X6550

The Xeon X6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,936 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3220T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X6550 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X6550 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X6550 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-3220T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-3220T is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-3220T scores 1,953 against the Xeon X6550's 1,936 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-3220T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X6550.

FeatureCore i3-3220TXeon X6550
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+17%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+40%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
18 MB L3 Cache+500%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,953
1,936
Geekbench 6 Single
465
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3220T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X6550 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-3220T) vs 4 (Xeon X6550). Chipset compatibility: B75,Z75,Z77,H77,Q75,Q77,H61,H67,P67,Z68 (Core i3-3220T) and Nehalem-EX (Xeon X6550).

FeatureCore i3-3220TXeon X6550
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1567
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X6550). The Core i3-3220T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon X6550 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop, Xeon X6550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500; Xeon X6550 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureCore i3-3220TXeon X6550
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
Server