
Core i3-3225

Xeon E3-1220L
Core i3-3225 vs Xeon E3-1220L Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-3225 vs Xeon E3-1220L FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-3225 vs Xeon E3-1220L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-3225
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($172 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.2 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($172 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon E3-1220L needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌175% higher power demand at 55W vs 20W.
Xeon E3-1220L
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 55W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,263 vs 2,276).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $172 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3225.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-3225 better than Xeon E3-1220L?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3225 vs Xeon E3-1220L Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3225
The Core i3-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,276 points. Launch price was $264.

Xeon E3-1220L
The Xeon E3-1220L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,263 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-3225 and Xeon E3-1220L share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-3225 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L — a 3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220L (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-3225 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3225 scores 2,276 against the Xeon E3-1220L's 2,263 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-3225. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-3225 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,276 | 2,263 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 558 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,142 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i3-3225 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3225) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220L). The Core i3-3225 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E3-1220L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3225 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3225 rivals Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).
| Feature | Core i3-3225 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-3225 was priced at $172, while the Xeon E3-1220L came in at $189. On launch pricing ($172 vs $189), Core i3-3225 was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3225 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 12.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220L — making the Core i3-3225 the 10% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3225 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $172-9% | $189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.2+10% | 12.0 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














