A10-6700T vs Core i3-3225

A10-6700T vs Core i3-3225 Performance Spectrum

A10-6700T

4 / 4

2,299

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-3225

2 / 4

2,276

0.0%

Celeron 847

Core i3-530

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700T vs Core i3-3225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700T vs Core i3-3225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700T

2013

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (289 vs 558).

Core i3-3225

2012

Why buy it

✅+93.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,276 vs 2,299).
❌Launch MSRP is still $172 MSRP, while A10-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700T better than Core i3-3225?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-3225 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10-6700T pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700T is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $172 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. Core i3-3225 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6700T vs Core i3-3225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-3225

The Core i3-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,276 points. Launch price was $264.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3225 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-3225 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The A10-6700T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3225 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Core i3-3225's 2,276 — a 1% lead for the A10-6700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 289 vs 558, a 63.5% lead for the Core i3-3225 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3225.

Feature	A10-6700T	Core i3-3225
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,299+1%	2,276
Geekbench 6 Single	289	558+93%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,142

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3225 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6700T versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3225 — the A10-6700T supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6700T) and H77,Z77,Q77,B75,P67,Z68,H67 (Core i3-3225).

Feature	A10-6700T	Core i3-3225
Socket	FM2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6700T) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3225). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650D (A10-6700T) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power, Core i3-3225 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T; Core i3-3225 rivals Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).