Celeron G4930T vs Core i3-3225

CPU

GPU

Celeron G4930T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-3225

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G4930T vs Core i3-3225 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G4930T

2 / 2

2,287

+0.5%

Core i7-660UM

Celeron G1620T

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2,276

0.0%

Celeron 847

Core i3-530

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4930T vs Core i3-3225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4930T vs Core i3-3225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4930T

2019

Why buy it

✅+7.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $172 MSRP).
✅Delivers 311.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.5 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $172 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (927 vs 1,142).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3225.

Core i3-3225

2012

Why buy it

✅+23.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G4930T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (558 vs 599).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($172 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4930T better than Core i3-3225?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4930T is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3225 pulls ahead with 23.2% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i3-3225 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3225 is the stronger fit. You are getting 23.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4930T comes in $130 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $172 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-3225 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 23.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 311.5% better value on MSRP (54.5 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4930T vs Core i3-3225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i3-3225

The Core i3-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,276 points. Launch price was $264.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3225's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-3225 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3225 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Celeron G4930T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3225 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4930T scores 2,287 against the Core i3-3225's 2,276 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G4930T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 599 vs 558, a 7.1% lead for the Celeron G4930T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 927 vs 1,142 (20.8% advantage for the Core i3-3225). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3225.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core i3-3225
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,287	2,276
Geekbench 6 Single	599+7%	558
Geekbench 6 Multi	927	1,142+23%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3225 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930T versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3225 — the Celeron G4930T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4930T) and H77,Z77,Q77,B75,P67,Z68,H67 (Core i3-3225).

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core i3-3225
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4930T) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3225). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4930T) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930T targets Budget, Core i3-3225 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T; Core i3-3225 rivals Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core i3-3225
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4930T was priced at $42, while the Core i3-3225 came in at $172. On launch pricing ($42 vs $172), Celeron G4930T was $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4930T delivers 54.5 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-3225 — making the Celeron G4930T the 121.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core i3-3225
MSRP	$42-76%	$172
Performance per Dollar	54.5+313%	13.2
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Celeron G4930T on Amazon

Search Core i3-3225 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.