Celeron G4930T vs Xeon X3350

Intel

Celeron G4930T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X3350

95 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G4930T vs Xeon X3350 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4930T vs Xeon X3350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4930T vs Xeon X3350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4930T

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon X3350 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (2,287 vs 2,291).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Xeon X3350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X3350

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3350 better than Celeron G4930T?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4930T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon X3350 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon X3350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4930T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,287 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4930T vs Xeon X3350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Xeon X3350

The Xeon X3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,291 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Celeron G4930T is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G4930T scores 2,287 against the Xeon X3350's 2,291 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X3350. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3350.

FeatureCeleron G4930TXeon X3350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+13%
2.66 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
2,287
2,291
Geekbench 6 Single
599
Geekbench 6 Multi
927
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3350 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G4930TXeon X3350
Socket
LGA1151
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4930T) / not specified (Xeon X3350). The Celeron G4930T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X3350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.

FeatureCeleron G4930TXeon X3350
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget