Celeron G4930T vs E2-7110

Celeron G4930T vs E2-7110 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G4930T

2 / 2

2,287

+0.2%

Core i7-660UM

Celeron G1620T

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2,282

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4930T vs E2-7110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4930T vs E2-7110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4930T

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while E2-7110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while E2-7110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,282 vs 2,287).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4930T better than E2-7110?

Yes. Celeron G4930T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4930T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4930T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4930T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4930T vs E2-7110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-7110 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-7110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T versus 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 — a 50% clock advantage for the Celeron G4930T. The Celeron G4930T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the E2-7110 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4930T scores 2,287 against the E2-7110's 2,282 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G4930T.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	E2-7110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark	2,287	2,282
Geekbench 6 Single	599	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	927	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-7110 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	E2-7110
Socket	LGA1151	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4930T) / not specified (E2-7110). The Celeron G4930T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the E2-7110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.