PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4930T vs Core m5-6Y54 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4930T vs Core m5-6Y54: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4930T

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 567.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.5 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (599 vs 875).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (927 vs 1,648).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌677.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 4.5W.

Core m5-6Y54

2015

Why buy it

✅+46.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core m5-6Y54 better than Celeron G4930T?

Yes. Core m5-6Y54 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 77.8% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.3% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core m5-6Y54 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y54 is the stronger fit. You are getting 77.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m5-6Y54 is still the better call for a fresh build. Core m5-6Y54 comes in 569.0% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4930T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,287 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4930T vs Core m5-6Y54 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

Core m5-6Y54

The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m5-6Y54's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T versus 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G4930T (base: 3 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron G4930T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4930T scores 2,287 against the Core m5-6Y54's 2,294 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m5-6Y54. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 599 vs 875, a 37.4% lead for the Core m5-6Y54 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 927 vs 1,648 (56% advantage for the Core m5-6Y54). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core m5-6Y54
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+11%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+173%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,287	2,294
Geekbench 6 Single	599	875+46%
Geekbench 6 Multi	927	1,648+78%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930T versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core m5-6Y54 — the Celeron G4930T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G4930T) vs 10 (Core m5-6Y54) — the Celeron G4930T offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4930T) and Skylake-Y (Core m5-6Y54).

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core m5-6Y54
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+29%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4930T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4930T) and HD Graphics 515 (Core m5-6Y54) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930T targets Budget, Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T; Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core m5-6Y54
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics 515
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Enthusiast

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4930T was priced at $42, while the Core m5-6Y54 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($42 vs $281), Celeron G4930T was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4930T delivers 54.5 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Core m5-6Y54 — making the Celeron G4930T the 147.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Core m5-6Y54
MSRP	$42-85%	$281
Performance per Dollar	54.5+565%	8.2
Release Date	2019	2015

Search Celeron G4930T on Amazon

Search Core m5-6Y54 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.