Celeron G4930T vs Opteron 3260 HE

Celeron G4930T vs Opteron 3260 HE Performance Spectrum

Celeron G4930T

2 / 2

2,287

+0.2%

Core i7-660UM

Celeron G1620T

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2,283

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4930T vs Opteron 3260 HE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4930T vs Opteron 3260 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4930T

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Opteron 3260 HE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3260 HE, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Opteron 3260 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 3260 HE

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,283 vs 2,287).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4930T better than Opteron 3260 HE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3260 HE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4930T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4930T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4930T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 3260 HE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4930T vs Opteron 3260 HE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

Opteron 3260 HE

The Opteron 3260 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $125.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 3260 HE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3260 HE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T versus 3.7 GHz on the Opteron 3260 HE — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Opteron 3260 HE (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron G4930T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3260 HE uses Zurich (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4930T scores 2,287 against the Opteron 3260 HE's 2,283 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G4930T. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T vs 4 MB (total) on the Opteron 3260 HE.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Opteron 3260 HE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3 GHz+11%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Zurich (2012)
PassMark	2,287	2,283
Geekbench 6 Single	599	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	927	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3260 HE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4930T	Opteron 3260 HE
Socket	LGA1151	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4930T) / not specified (Opteron 3260 HE). The Celeron G4930T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Opteron 3260 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.