Core i3-3229Y
VS
Athlon II X2 215

Core i3-3229Y vs Athlon II X2 215

Intel

Core i3-3229Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 215

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3229Y is positioned at rank 437 and the Athlon II X2 215 is on rank 739, so the Core i3-3229Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3229Y

#425
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
579%
#426
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
570%
#427
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
523%
#428
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
521%
#429
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
516%
#431
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
499%
#432
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
478%
#433
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
477%
#434
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
464%
#437
Core i3-3229Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 215

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13872%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13108%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9518%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2867%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2271%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1987%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1138%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1123%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1023%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1023%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1011%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
984%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
970%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
966%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
957%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
99%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
100%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
99%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
99%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
99%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
98%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
98%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
98%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
98%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
97%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
97%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3229Y delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon II X2 215 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-3229YAthlon II X2 215
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3229YAthlon II X2 215
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3229Y and Athlon II X2 215

Intel

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

AMD

Athlon II X2 215

The Athlon II X2 215 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3229Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II X2 215's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 215 — a 63.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 215 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-3229Y uses the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II X2 215 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3229Y scores 1,014 against the Athlon II X2 215's 1,011 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-3229Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 274, a 24.4% lead for the Core i3-3229Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 674 (2.6% advantage for the Athlon II X2 215). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3229Y vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 215.

FeatureCore i3-3229YAthlon II X2 215
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2.7 GHz+93%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
2.7 GHz+93%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,014
1,011
Geekbench 6 Single
350+28%
274
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
674+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3229Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 215 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-3229Y versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 215 — the Athlon II X2 215 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3229Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-3229Y) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 215) — the Core i3-3229Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 215).

FeatureCore i3-3229YAthlon II X2 215
Socket
BGA1023
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+209715100%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y) vs true (Athlon II X2 215). The Core i3-3229Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Athlon II X2 215 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3229Y targets Budget, Athlon II X2 215 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE; Athlon II X2 215 rivals Pentium E5400.

FeatureCore i3-3229YAthlon II X2 215
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
true
Target Use
Budget
Budget