Core i3-3229Y
VS
Athlon 64 X2 3600+

Core i3-3229Y vs Athlon 64 X2 3600+

Intel

Core i3-3229Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 3600+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3229Y is positioned at rank 437 and the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is on rank 1053, so the Core i3-3229Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3229Y

#425
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
579%
#426
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
570%
#427
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
523%
#428
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
521%
#429
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
516%
#431
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
499%
#432
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
478%
#433
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
477%
#434
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
464%
#437
Core i3-3229Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 3600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
45840%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
43315%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
31450%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9475%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7505%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6565%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3760%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3711%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3379%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3379%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3341%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3251%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3205%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3193%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3164%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
100%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
99%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
98%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
96%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
95%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
94%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
94%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
93%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
89%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
89%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
86%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
86%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
86%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
85%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-3229Y (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-3229YAthlon 64 X2 3600+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-3229YAthlon 64 X2 3600+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3229Y and Athlon 64 X2 3600+

Intel

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 3600+

The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3229Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon 64 X2 3600+'s 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 3600+. The Core i3-3229Y uses the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ uses Manchester (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3229Y scores 1,014 against the Athlon 64 X2 3600+'s 1,020 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 3600+. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3229Y vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+.

FeatureCore i3-3229YAthlon 64 X2 3600+
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2 GHz+43%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-76%
90 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
Manchester (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,014
1,020
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3229Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-3229Y versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ — the Core i3-3229Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3229Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-3229Y) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 3600+) — the Core i3-3229Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 3600+).

FeatureCore i3-3229YAthlon 64 X2 3600+
Socket
BGA1023
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 3600+). The Core i3-3229Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.

FeatureCore i3-3229YAthlon 64 X2 3600+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget