Core i3-3229Y
VS
Core 2 Duo E4700

Core i3-3229Y vs Core 2 Duo E4700

Intel

Core i3-3229Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3229Y is positioned at rank 437 and the Core 2 Duo E4700 is on rank 1035, so the Core i3-3229Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3229Y

#425
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
579%
#426
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
570%
#427
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
523%
#428
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
521%
#429
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
516%
#431
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
499%
#432
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
478%
#433
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
477%
#434
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
464%
#437
Core i3-3229Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41015%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
38755%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28139%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8477%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6715%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5874%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3364%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3321%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3023%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3023%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2989%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2909%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2868%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2856%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2831%
#1034
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
100%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
100%
#1036
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
100%
#1037
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
100%
#1038
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
99%
#1039
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1042
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1043
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
96%
#1044
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
94%
#1046
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
93%
#1047
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
92%
#1048
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
92%
#1049
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E4700 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-3229Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-3229YCore 2 Duo E4700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3229YCore 2 Duo E4700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3229Y and Core 2 Duo E4700

Intel

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3229Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E4700's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 — a 60% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-3229Y uses the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3229Y scores 1,014 against the Core 2 Duo E4700's 1,011 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-3229Y. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3229Y vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4700.

FeatureCore i3-3229YCore 2 Duo E4700
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2.6 GHz+86%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
2.6 GHz+86%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,014
1,011
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3229Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-3229Y versus 800 on the Core 2 Duo E4700 — the Core 2 Duo E4700 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3229Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4700).

FeatureCore i3-3229YCore 2 Duo E4700
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
800+26567%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+209715100%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y) vs false (Core 2 Duo E4700). The Core i3-3229Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE; Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

FeatureCore i3-3229YCore 2 Duo E4700
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
false
Target Use
Budget