Core i3-3240
VS
Xeon E5440

Core i3-3240 vs Xeon E5440

Intel

Core i3-3240

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5440

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.83 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3240 is positioned at rank 847 and the Xeon E5440 is on rank 1008, so the Core i3-3240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17492%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16529%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12001%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3615%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2864%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2505%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1435%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1416%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1289%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1289%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1275%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1241%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1223%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1218%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1207%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5440

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
60590%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
11440%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
10164%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
7852%
#540
Xeon E7-8891 v3
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $418
92%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
73%
#1008
Xeon E5440
MSRP: $690|Avg: $37
100%
#1009
Xeon E5-2643
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $50
98%
#1010
Xeon E5-2637
MSRP: $885|Avg: $40
98%
#1011
Xeon W3570
MSRP: $999|Avg: $15
95%
#1013
Xeon E5-4620
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $400
90%
#1014
Xeon E5-2680
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $40
84%
#1016
Xeon E5-4640
MSRP: $2725|Avg: N/A
75%
#1018
Xeon E5-4650
MSRP: $3616|Avg: $71
69%
#1019
Xeon E5-4655 v4
MSRP: $4616|Avg: N/A
69%
#1020
Xeon E5-4650L
MSRP: $3616|Avg: N/A
69%
#1021
Xeon E-2224
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $195
65%
#1022
Athlon MP 2400+
MSRP: $151|Avg: $20
59%
#1023
Xeon E5-2650L v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $1078
54%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($37) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5440 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i3-3240Xeon E5440
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($37)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3240 ($15), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($22 less, 59% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i3-3240Xeon E5440
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+145%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($37)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3240 and Xeon E5440

Intel

Core i3-3240

The Core i3-3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,352 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Xeon E5440

The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3240 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-3240 versus 0.83 GHz on the Xeon E5440 — a 121.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Core i3-3240 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5440 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3240 scores 2,352 against the Xeon E5440's 2,367 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5440. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440.

FeatureCore i3-3240Xeon E5440
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+310%
0.83 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+20%
2.83 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
6 MB (total)+2300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
2,352
2,367
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3240 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5440 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-3240Xeon E5440
Socket
LGA1155
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-3240 launched at $132 MSRP, while the Xeon E5440 debuted at $690. At current prices ($15 vs $37), the Core i3-3240 is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3240 delivers 156.8 pts/$ vs 64.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5440 — making the Core i3-3240 the 84.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-3240Xeon E5440
MSRP
$132-81%
$690
Avg Price (30d)
$15-59%
$37
Performance per Dollar
156.8+145%
64.0
Release Date
2012
2007