Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Core i3-3250
Popular choices:
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-3250 is positioned at rank #846 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-3250 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($486) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-3250 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+109%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($486) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3250 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Core i3-3250
The Core i3-3250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $138.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i3-3250 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-3250 versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 47.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i3-3250 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3250 scores 2,460 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 184.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 16 / 32+700% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+63% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+4167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-77% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 2,460 | 62,323+2433% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-3250 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3250) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i3-3250 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-3250 launched at $138 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. At current prices ($40 vs $486), the Core i3-3250 is $446 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3250 delivers 61.5 pts/$ vs 128.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 70.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-80% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-92% | $486 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.5 | 128.2+108% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-3250 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
