Core i3-350M vs Core i7-620UM
Core i3-350M
Core i7-620UM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-350M is positioned at rank 17 and the Core i7-620UM is on rank 1228, so the Core i3-350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-350M
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620UM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-350M | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($278) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-350M | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2672%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($278) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-350M and Core i7-620UM
Core i3-350M
The Core i3-350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,088 points. Launch price was $130.
Core i7-620UM
The Core i7-620UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $278.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-350M and Core i7-620UM share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Core i3-350M versus 2.13 GHz on the Core i7-620UM — a 155% clock advantage for the Core i7-620UM (base: 2.26 GHz vs 1.06 GHz). Both are built on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-350M scores 1,088 against the Core i7-620UM's 1,091 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-620UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 280 vs 350, a 22.2% lead for the Core i7-620UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 650 vs 700 (7.4% advantage for the Core i7-620UM). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-350M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620UM.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.27 GHz | 2.13 GHz+689% |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz+113% | 1.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,088 | 1,091 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 280 | 350+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 650 | 700+8% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-350M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-620UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57 (Core i3-350M) and HM55,QM57 (Core i7-620UM).
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-350M) vs VT-x (Core i7-620UM). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-350M) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i7-620UM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-350M targets Entry Laptop, Core i7-620UM targets Ultra-Portable Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-350M rivals AMD Athlon II P320; Core i7-620UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Entry Laptop | Ultra-Portable Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-350M launched at $130 MSRP, while the Core i7-620UM debuted at $278.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130-53% | $278 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-350M and Core i7-620UM
