Core i3-350M
VS
Phenom X3 8250e

Core i3-350M vs Phenom X3 8250e

Intel

Core i3-350M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8250e

3 Cores3 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-350M is positioned at rank 17 and the Phenom X3 8250e is on rank 538, so the Core i3-350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-350M

#5
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
135%
#6
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
133%
#7
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
122%
#8
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
121%
#9
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
120%
#11
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
116%
#12
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
111%
#13
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
111%
#14
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
108%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
100%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
99%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
98%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
88%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
84%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
84%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
80%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
80%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
79%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
79%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
78%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8250e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8628%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8152%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5919%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1783%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1412%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1236%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
708%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
698%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
636%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
636%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
629%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
612%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
603%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
601%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
595%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
98%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
96%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
95%
#538
Phenom X3 8250e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
99%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
97%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
97%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
97%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
96%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
95%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
94%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
94%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
94%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom X3 8250e leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-350M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-350MPhenom X3 8250e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-350MPhenom X3 8250e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8250e

Intel

Core i3-350M

The Core i3-350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,088 points. Launch price was $130.

AMD

Phenom X3 8250e

The Phenom X3 8250e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,084 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i3-350M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X3 8250e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8250e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Core i3-350M versus 1.9 GHz on the Phenom X3 8250e — a 150.2% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8250e. The Core i3-350M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-350M scores 1,088 against the Phenom X3 8250e's 1,084 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-350M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-350M vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8250e.

FeatureCore i3-350MPhenom X3 8250e
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
0.27 GHz
1.9 GHz+604%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,088
1,084
Geekbench 6 Single
280
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-350M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-350MPhenom X3 8250e
Socket
PGA988
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-350M) / not specified (Phenom X3 8250e). The Core i3-350M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom X3 8250e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-350M targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-350M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.

FeatureCore i3-350MPhenom X3 8250e
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry Laptop