Core i3-4010Y
VS
Core 2 Duo E8600

Core i3-4010Y vs Core 2 Duo E8600

Intel

Core i3-4010Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4010Y is positioned at rank 639 and the Core 2 Duo E8600 is on rank 1050, so the Core i3-4010Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4010Y

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
99%
#627
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
864%
#628
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
852%
#629
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
782%
#630
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
778%
#631
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
771%
#633
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
745%
#634
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
714%
#635
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
713%
#636
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
694%
#639
Core i3-4010Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
45242%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
42749%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
31039%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9351%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7407%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6480%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3711%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3663%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3335%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3335%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3297%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3208%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3164%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3151%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3122%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
100%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
99%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
99%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
99%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
98%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
96%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
95%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
94%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
93%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
92%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
92%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
88%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
88%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
85%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E8600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-4010Y in both compute-intensive tasks (1.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-4010YCore 2 Duo E8600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4010YCore 2 Duo E8600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4010Y and Core 2 Duo E8600

Intel

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8600

The Core 2 Duo E8600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,378 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4010Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E8600's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y versus 3.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8600 — a 87.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8600 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i3-4010Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010Y scores 1,358 against the Core 2 Duo E8600's 1,378 — a 1.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8600. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E8600.

FeatureCore i3-4010YCore 2 Duo E8600
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
3.33 GHz+156%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.33 GHz+156%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
6 MB (total)+2300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,358
1,378+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
486
Geekbench 6 Multi
885
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4010Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-4010Y) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E8600) — the Core 2 Duo E8600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-4010YCore 2 Duo E8600
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E8600). The Core i3-4010Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Core 2 Duo E8600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile, Core 2 Duo E8600 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E8600 rivals Phenom II X2 550.

FeatureCore i3-4010YCore 2 Duo E8600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4200
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile
Legacy Desktop