Core i3-4010Y vs Phenom X4 9100e

Core i3-4010Y vs Phenom X4 9100e Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4010Y

2 / 4

1,358

+0.4%

Celeron 867

Celeron P4500

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

1,353

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4010Y vs Phenom X4 9100e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4010Y vs Phenom X4 9100e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4200, while Phenom X4 9100e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Phenom X4 9100e

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,353 vs 1,358).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Core i3-4010Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4010Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom X4 9100e better than Core i3-4010Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom X4 9100e is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i3-4010Y also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom X4 9100e is the better buy right now. Phenom X4 9100e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-4010Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4010Y vs Phenom X4 9100e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

Phenom X4 9100e

The Phenom X4 9100e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,353 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4010Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X4 9100e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9100e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y versus 1.8 GHz on the Phenom X4 9100e — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9100e. The Core i3-4010Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9100e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010Y scores 1,358 against the Phenom X4 9100e's 1,353 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4010Y. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9100e.

Feature	Core i3-4010Y	Phenom X4 9100e
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	1.8 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,358	1,353

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4010Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9100e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4010Y	Phenom X4 9100e
Socket	FCBGA1168	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y) / not specified (Phenom X4 9100e). The Core i3-4010Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Phenom X4 9100e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile.