Core i3-2370M vs Core i3-4010Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2370M vs Core i3-4010Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2370M vs Core i3-4010Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2370M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core i3-4010Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,358 vs 1,370).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2370M better than Core i3-4010Y?

Yes. Core i3-2370M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2370M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2370M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2370M is the better buy right now. Core i3-2370M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-2370M vs Core i3-4010Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2370M

The Core i3-2370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2370M and Core i3-4010Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-2370M versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-2370M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i3-2370M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4010Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2370M scores 1,370 against the Core i3-4010Y's 1,358 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-2370M. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2370M	Core i3-4010Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,370	1,358
Geekbench 6 Single	412	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	711	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2370M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4010Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2370M versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4010Y — the Core i3-4010Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-2370M) vs 12 (Core i3-4010Y) — the Core i3-2370M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-2370M	Core i3-4010Y
Socket	PGA988	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i3-2370M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2370M) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4010Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2370M targets Laptop, Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile.