Celeron 4205U vs Core i3-4010Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4205U vs Core i3-4010Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4205U vs Core i3-4010Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4205U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,350 vs 1,358).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 4205U better than Core i3-4010Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 4205U is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i3-4010Y also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 4205U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 4205U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 4205U vs Core i3-4010Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 4205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4010Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Celeron 4205U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4010Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the Core i3-4010Y's 1,358 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4010Y. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Core i3-4010Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,350	1,358
Geekbench 6 Single	347	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	585	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4010Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4205U versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4010Y — the Celeron 4205U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4205U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 12 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Core i3-4010Y
Socket	FCBGA1528	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4205U) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4010Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget, Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.