Celeron 4205U
VS
Core i3-L13G4

Celeron 4205U vs Core i3-L13G4

Intel

Celeron 4205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i3-L13G4

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 4205U is positioned at rank 152 and the Core i3-L13G4 is on rank 1210, so the Celeron 4205U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4205U

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
98%
#140
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
326%
#141
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
321%
#142
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
295%
#143
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
294%
#144
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
291%
#146
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
281%
#147
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
269%
#148
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
269%
#149
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
262%
#152
Celeron 4205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-L13G4

#1198
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6113%
#1199
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6023%
#1200
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5529%
#1201
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5504%
#1202
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5454%
#1204
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5267%
#1205
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5050%
#1206
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5042%
#1207
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4906%
#1210
Core i3-L13G4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
99%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
97%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
96%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
95%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
95%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
93%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
92%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
87%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
85%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
85%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-L13G4 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 4205U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 4205UCore i3-L13G4
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 4205UCore i3-L13G4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 4205U and Core i3-L13G4

Intel

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Celeron 4205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i3-L13G4 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Core i3-L13G4 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-L13G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses Lakefield (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the Core i3-L13G4's 1,349 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 4205U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-L13G4.

FeatureCeleron 4205UCore i3-L13G4
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
5 / 5+150%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz+125%
0.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Lakefield (2020)
PassMark
1,350
1,349
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses FC-CSP1016 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. The Celeron 4205U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 4205U) vs 4 (Core i3-L13G4). PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 4205U) vs 8 (Core i3-L13G4) — the Celeron 4205U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron 4205UCore i3-L13G4
Socket
FCBGA1528
FC-CSP1016
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
LPDDR4x-4267
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+700%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12+50%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4205U) and UHD Graphics (Core i3-L13G4) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget, Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.

FeatureCeleron 4205UCore i3-L13G4
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Mobile