Celeron 4205U vs Pentium 3560M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4205U vs Pentium 3560M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4205U vs Pentium 3560M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4205U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Pentium 3560M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 3560M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,345 vs 1,350).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 4205U better than Pentium 3560M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium 3560M is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4205U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4205U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 4205U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 4205U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 4205U vs Pentium 3560M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium 3560M

The Pentium 3560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,345 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4205U and Pentium 3560M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 3560M — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium 3560M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 3560M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the Pentium 3560M's 1,345 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 4205U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3560M.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Pentium 3560M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,350	1,345
Geekbench 6 Single	347	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	585	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3560M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Pentium 3560M
Socket	FCBGA1528	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U) / not specified (Pentium 3560M). The Celeron 4205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Pentium 3560M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.