Celeron 3865U
VS
Celeron 4205U

Celeron 3865U vs Celeron 4205U

Intel

Celeron 3865U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Celeron 4205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3865U is positioned at rank 645 and the Celeron 4205U is on rank 152, so the Celeron 4205U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3865U

#633
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
874%
#634
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
861%
#635
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
790%
#636
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
787%
#637
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
780%
#639
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
753%
#640
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
722%
#641
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
721%
#642
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
701%
#645
Celeron 3865U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4205U

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
98%
#140
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
326%
#141
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
321%
#142
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
295%
#143
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
294%
#144
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
291%
#146
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
281%
#147
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
269%
#148
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
269%
#149
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
262%
#152
Celeron 4205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 3865U leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 4205U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 3865UCeleron 4205U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 3865UCeleron 4205U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3865U and Celeron 4205U

Intel

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3865U and Celeron 4205U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron 3865U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron 4205U uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3865U scores 1,343 against the Celeron 4205U's 1,350 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 4205U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 389 vs 347, a 11.4% lead for the Celeron 3865U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 674 vs 585 (14.1% advantage for the Celeron 3865U). Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron 3865UCeleron 4205U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,343
1,350
Geekbench 6 Single
389+12%
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
674+15%
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3865U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 4205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 memory speed. The Celeron 4205U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 3865U) vs 12 (Celeron 4205U) — the Celeron 4205U offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,200-series (Celeron 3865U) and Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4205U).

FeatureCeleron 3865UCeleron 4205U
Socket
BGA1356
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
12+20%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3865U) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4205U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level, Celeron 4205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U; Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.

FeatureCeleron 3865UCeleron 4205U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Entry-level
Budget