Celeron 3865U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Celeron 3865U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 3865U

2 / 2

1,343

+0.3%

1,339

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3865U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3865U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3865U

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,339 vs 1,343).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3865U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 3865U better than Turion 64 X2 TL-58?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3865U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3865U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 3865U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 3865U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3865U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 3865U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3865U and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58. The Celeron 3865U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3865U scores 1,343 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 3865U.

Feature	Celeron 3865U	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	1.9 GHz+6%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake-U (2017)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,343	1,339
Geekbench 6 Single	389	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	674	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-58). The Celeron 3865U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.