Celeron 3865U vs Core i3-4010Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3865U vs Core i3-4010Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3865U vs Core i3-4010Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3865U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,343 vs 1,358).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 3865U better than Core i3-4010Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 3865U is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Core i3-4010Y also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 3865U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 3865U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3865U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3865U vs Core i3-4010Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3865U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4010Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Celeron 3865U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron 3865U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4010Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3865U scores 1,343 against the Core i3-4010Y's 1,358 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-4010Y. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3865U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y.

Feature	Celeron 3865U	Core i3-4010Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake-U (2017)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,343	1,358+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	389	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	674	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3865U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4010Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 on the Celeron 3865U versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4010Y — the Celeron 3865U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3865U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 3865U) vs 12 (Core i3-4010Y) — the Core i3-4010Y offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 3865U	Core i3-4010Y
Socket	BGA1356	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866+33%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	10	12+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3865U) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4010Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level, Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.

Feature	Celeron 3865U	Core i3-4010Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 610	HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Entry-level	Mobile