Celeron 3865U vs Pentium 3560M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3865U vs Pentium 3560M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3865U vs Pentium 3560M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3865U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Pentium 3560M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,343 vs 1,345).

Pentium 3560M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3865U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 3560M better than Celeron 3865U?

Yes. Pentium 3560M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 3560M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3560M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 3560M still makes the most sense overall. Pentium 3560M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3865U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3865U vs Pentium 3560M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium 3560M

The Pentium 3560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,345 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3865U and Pentium 3560M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 3560M — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium 3560M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 3865U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 3560M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3865U scores 1,343 against the Pentium 3560M's 1,345 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 3560M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3865U vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3560M.

Feature	Celeron 3865U	Pentium 3560M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake-U (2017)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,343	1,345
Geekbench 6 Single	389	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	674	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3865U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3560M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3865U	Pentium 3560M
Socket	BGA1356	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U) / not specified (Pentium 3560M). The Celeron 3865U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium 3560M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.