Celeron 3865U
VS
Core i3-L13G4

Celeron 3865U vs Core i3-L13G4

Intel

Celeron 3865U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i3-L13G4

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3865U is positioned at rank 645 and the Core i3-L13G4 is on rank 1210, so the Celeron 3865U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3865U

#633
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
874%
#634
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
861%
#635
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
790%
#636
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
787%
#637
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
780%
#639
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
753%
#640
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
722%
#641
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
721%
#642
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
701%
#645
Celeron 3865U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-L13G4

#1198
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6113%
#1199
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6023%
#1200
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5529%
#1201
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5504%
#1202
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5454%
#1204
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5267%
#1205
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5050%
#1206
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5042%
#1207
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4906%
#1210
Core i3-L13G4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
99%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
97%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
96%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
95%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
95%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
93%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
92%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
87%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
85%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
85%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-L13G4 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 3865U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 3865UCore i3-L13G4
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 3865UCore i3-L13G4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3865U and Core i3-L13G4

Intel

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Celeron 3865U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i3-L13G4 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Core i3-L13G4 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-L13G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Celeron 3865U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses Lakefield (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3865U scores 1,343 against the Core i3-L13G4's 1,349 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-L13G4. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3865U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-L13G4.

FeatureCeleron 3865UCore i3-L13G4
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
5 / 5+150%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz+125%
0.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Lakefield (2020)
PassMark
1,343
1,349
Geekbench 6 Single
389
Geekbench 6 Multi
674
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3865U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses FC-CSP1016 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 memory speed. The Celeron 3865U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 3865U) vs 4 (Core i3-L13G4). PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 3865U) vs 8 (Core i3-L13G4) — the Celeron 3865U offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron 3865UCore i3-L13G4
Socket
BGA1356
FC-CSP1016
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866
LPDDR4x-4267
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10+25%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-L13G4). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3865U) and UHD Graphics (Core i3-L13G4) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level, Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.

FeatureCeleron 3865UCore i3-L13G4
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Entry-level
Mobile