Celeron 4205U vs Pentium G640

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4205U vs Pentium G640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4205U vs Pentium G640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4205U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Pentium G640 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,350 vs 1,369).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium G640

2012

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Celeron 4205U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G640 better than Celeron 4205U?

Yes. Pentium G640 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G640 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G640 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G640 is the better buy right now. Pentium G640 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $64 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 4205U vs Pentium G640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium G640

The Pentium G640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,369 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4205U and Pentium G640 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G640 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G640 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G640 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the Pentium G640's 1,369 — a 1.4% lead for the Pentium G640. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Pentium G640
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,350	1,369+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	347	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	585	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G640 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Pentium G640
Socket	FCBGA1528	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U) / not specified (Pentium G640). The Celeron 4205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Pentium G640 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.