Celeron 4205U vs Phenom X4 9100e

Celeron 4205U vs Phenom X4 9100e Performance Spectrum

Celeron 4205U

2 / 2

1,350

0.0%

1,353

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4205U vs Phenom X4 9100e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4205U vs Phenom X4 9100e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4205U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Phenom X4 9100e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,350 vs 1,353).

Phenom X4 9100e

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Celeron 4205U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom X4 9100e better than Celeron 4205U?

Yes. Phenom X4 9100e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9100e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom X4 9100e is the better buy right now. Phenom X4 9100e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 4205U vs Phenom X4 9100e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom X4 9100e

The Phenom X4 9100e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,353 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 4205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9100e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9100e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 1.8 GHz on the Phenom X4 9100e — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X4 9100e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the Phenom X4 9100e's 1,353 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom X4 9100e. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Phenom X4 9100e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,350	1,353
Geekbench 6 Single	347	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	585	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9100e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Phenom X4 9100e
Socket	FCBGA1528	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U) / not specified (Phenom X4 9100e). The Celeron 4205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Phenom X4 9100e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.