Celeron 4205U vs Core i3-2370M

Celeron 4205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2019

Core i3-2370M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 4205U

2 / 2

1,350

0.0%

1,370

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 4205U is positioned at rank 152 and the Core i3-2370M is on rank 1186, so the Celeron 4205U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4205U

#42

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A

98%

#140

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

326%

#141

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

321%

#142

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

295%

#143

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

294%

#144

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

291%

#146

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

281%

#147

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

269%

#148

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

269%

#149

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

262%

#152

Celeron 4205U

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#158

Core i5-3210M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $30

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2370M

#1174

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

4818%

#1175

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

4747%

#1176

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

4358%

#1177

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

4338%

#1178

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

4299%

#1180

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

4151%

#1181

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3980%

#1182

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3974%

#1183

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3867%

#1186

Core i3-2370M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

100%

#1187

Core i3-3217UE

MSRP: $225|Avg: $35

99%

#1188

Celeron T3000

MSRP: $150|Avg: $54

99%

#1189

Core m7-6Y75

MSRP: $393|Avg: $393

99%

#1190

Core M-5Y10

MSRP: $281|Avg: $20

96%

#1193

Celeron 900

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

93%

#1194

Pentium T3400

MSRP: $150|Avg: $90

92%

#1195

Core 2 Solo SU3500

MSRP: $262|Avg: $15

92%

#1196

Core 2 Duo E8335

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#1199

Celeron 560

MSRP: $89|Avg: $5

88%

#1200

Core i3-2312M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

87%

#1201

Celeron 857

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 4205U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron 4205U	Core i3-2370M
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-2370M (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron 4205U	Core i3-2370M
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 4205U Benchmark Check

Core i3-2370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 4205U and Core i3-2370M

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-2370M

The Core i3-2370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 4205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2370M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-2370M — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-2370M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-2370M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the Core i3-2370M's 1,370 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i3-2370M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 347 vs 412, a 17.1% lead for the Core i3-2370M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 585 vs 711 (19.4% advantage for the Core i3-2370M). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2370M.

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Core i3-2370M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,350	1,370+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	347	412+19%
Geekbench 6 Multi	585	711+22%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2370M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4205U versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2370M — the Celeron 4205U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4205U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 4205U) vs 16 (Core i3-2370M) — the Core i3-2370M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4205U) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2370M).

Feature	Celeron 4205U	Core i3-2370M
Socket	FCBGA1528	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U) vs VT-x (Core i3-2370M). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4205U) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2370M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget, Core i3-2370M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.