Core i3-4170T
VS
A10-6790K

Core i3-4170T vs A10-6790K

Intel

Core i3-4170T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015
VS
AMD

A10-6790K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4170T is positioned at rank 645 and the A10-6790K is on rank 414, so the A10-6790K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4170T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11640%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10999%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7986%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2406%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1906%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1667%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
955%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
942%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
858%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
858%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
848%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
825%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
814%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
811%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
803%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
98%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
100%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
100%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
100%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
99%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
99%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
99%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
98%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
98%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-6790K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6010%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5678%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4123%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1242%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
984%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
861%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
493%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
487%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
443%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
443%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
438%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
426%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
420%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
419%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
415%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
99%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
99%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
98%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#414
A10-6790K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#419
Celeron G3900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
99%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
98%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
98%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
98%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
96%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-4170T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A10-6790K in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-4170TA10-6790K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4170TA10-6790K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4170T and A10-6790K

Intel

Core i3-4170T

The Core i3-4170T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,133 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A10-6790K

The A10-6790K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4170T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-6790K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6790K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4170T versus 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790K — a 29.3% clock advantage for the A10-6790K (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i3-4170T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A10-6790K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4170T scores 3,133 against the A10-6790K's 3,112 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-4170T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 800 vs 412, a 64% lead for the Core i3-4170T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4170T vs 0 kB on the A10-6790K.

FeatureCore i3-4170TA10-6790K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.3 GHz+34%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
4 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
3,133
3,112
Geekbench 6 Single
800+94%
412
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4170T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-6790K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85 (Core i3-4170T) and A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-6790K).

FeatureCore i3-4170TA10-6790K
Socket
LGA1150
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-6790K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4170T) vs AMD-V (A10-6790K). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4170T) and Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6790K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4170T targets Low Power Desktop, A10-6790K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6790K rivals Core i3-4340.

FeatureCore i3-4170TA10-6790K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4400
Radeon HD 8670D
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
Budget