Core i3-6100H vs Phenom II X6 1035T

Core i3-6100H vs Phenom II X6 1035T Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6100H

2 / 4

3,003

0.0%

3,012

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6100H vs Phenom II X6 1035T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6100H vs Phenom II X6 1035T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6100H

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,003 vs 3,012).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1035T.

Phenom II X6 1035T

2010

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i3-6100H.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X6 1035T better than Core i3-6100H?

Yes. Phenom II X6 1035T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X6 1035T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1035T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X6 1035T still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X6 1035T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6100H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6100H vs Phenom II X6 1035T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6100H

The Core i3-6100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,003 points. Launch price was $225.

Phenom II X6 1035T

The Phenom II X6 1035T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,012 points. Launch price was $189.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6100H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1035T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1035T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100H versus 3.1 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1035T — a 13.8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1035T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-6100H uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1035T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100H scores 3,003 against the Phenom II X6 1035T's 3,012 — a 0.3% lead for the Phenom II X6 1035T. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6100H vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1035T.

Feature	Core i3-6100H	Phenom II X6 1035T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.1 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+4%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Thuban (2010)
PassMark	3,003	3,012
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	2,670

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6100H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1035T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-6100H	Phenom II X6 1035T
Socket	BGA1440	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-6100H) / AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1035T). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1035T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1035T rivals Core i5-750.