A10-5800B vs Core i3-6100H

A10-5800B vs Core i3-6100H Performance Spectrum

A10-5800B

4 / 4

3,027

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-6100H

2 / 4

3,003

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800B vs Core i3-6100H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800B vs Core i3-6100H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800B

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Core i3-6100H needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-6100H.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-6100H

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5800B across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,003 vs 3,027).
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5800B better than Core i3-6100H?

Yes. A10-5800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5800B still makes the most sense overall. A10-5800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6100H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5800B vs Core i3-6100H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800B

The A10-5800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,027 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-6100H

The Core i3-6100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,003 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6100H offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800B versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100H — a 43.5% clock advantage for the A10-5800B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A10-5800B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6100H uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800B scores 3,027 against the Core i3-6100H's 3,003 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-5800B. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800B vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6100H.

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i3-6100H
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+56%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+41%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,027	3,003
Geekbench 6 Single	459	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5800B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-6100H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i3-6100H
Socket	FM2	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5800B) / not specified (Core i3-6100H). The A10-5800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core i3-6100H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-5800B rivals Core i3-3220.