Core i3-6100H vs PRO A10-8770E

Core i3-6100H vs PRO A10-8770E Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6100H

2 / 4

3,003

+0.1%

3,001

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6100H vs PRO A10-8770E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6100H vs PRO A10-8770E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6100H

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

PRO A10-8770E

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,001 vs 3,003).
❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Core i3-6100H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8770E better than Core i3-6100H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-8770E is ahead with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100H pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8770E is the better buy right now. PRO A10-8770E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $395 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-6100H is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8770E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6100H vs PRO A10-8770E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6100H

The Core i3-6100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,003 points. Launch price was $225.

PRO A10-8770E

The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6100H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100H versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E — a 25.8% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770E (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-6100H uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8770E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100H scores 3,003 against the PRO A10-8770E's 3,001 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-6100H.

Feature	Core i3-6100H	PRO A10-8770E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.5 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,003	3,001

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6100H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8770E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.