Core i3-6100TE vs Core i3-10110Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6100TE vs Core i3-10110Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6100TE vs Core i3-10110Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6100TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Core i3-10110Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10110Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,152 vs 3,171).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Core i3-10110Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-10110Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6100TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10110Y better than Core i3-6100TE?

Yes. Core i3-10110Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10110Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10110Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-10110Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-6100TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6100TE vs Core i3-10110Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6100TE

The Core i3-6100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,152 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i3-10110Y

The Core i3-10110Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,171 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6100TE and Core i3-10110Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100TE versus 4 GHz on the Core i3-10110Y — a 38.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110Y. The Core i3-6100TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-10110Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100TE scores 3,152 against the Core i3-10110Y's 3,171 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-10110Y. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i3-6100TE vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110Y.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	Core i3-10110Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	4 GHz+48%
Base Clock	—	1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark	3,152	3,171

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6100TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10110Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	Core i3-10110Y
Socket	LGA1151	UTFCBGA1377
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6100TE) / not specified (Core i3-10110Y). The Core i3-6100TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core i3-10110Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6100TE targets Embedded.