Core i3-6100TE vs FX-770K

Core i3-6100TE vs FX-770K Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6100TE

2 / 4

3,152

0.0%

3,172

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6100TE vs FX-770K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6100TE vs FX-770K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6100TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while FX-770K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-770K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,152 vs 3,172).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while FX-770K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

FX-770K

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6100TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-770K better than Core i3-6100TE?

Yes. FX-770K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-770K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-770K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-770K is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-770K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-6100TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6100TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6100TE vs FX-770K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6100TE

The Core i3-6100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,152 points. Launch price was $117.

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6100TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-770K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-770K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100TE versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K — a 36.4% clock advantage for the FX-770K. The Core i3-6100TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-770K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100TE scores 3,152 against the FX-770K's 3,172 — a 0.6% lead for the FX-770K.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	FX-770K
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+44%
Base Clock	—	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,152	3,172

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6100TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-770K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	FX-770K
Socket	LGA1151	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6100TE) / not specified (FX-770K). The Core i3-6100TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the FX-770K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6100TE targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	FX-770K
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6100TE was priced at $250, while the FX-770K came in at $0. On launch pricing ($250 vs $0), FX-770K was $250 cheaper.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	FX-770K
MSRP	$250	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	12.6	—
Release Date	2015	2014

Search Core i3-6100TE on Amazon

Search FX-770K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.