A10-6800K vs Core i3-6100TE

A10-6800K vs Core i3-6100TE Performance Spectrum

A10-6800K

4 / 4

3,186

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-6100TE

2 / 4

3,152

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6800K vs Core i3-6100TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6800K vs Core i3-6100TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6800K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-6100TE.

Trade-offs

❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Core i3-6100TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6800K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,152 vs 3,186).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while A10-6800K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6800K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6800K better than Core i3-6100TE?

Yes. A10-6800K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6800K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6800K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6800K is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-6800K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-6100TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6100TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6800K vs Core i3-6100TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Core i3-6100TE

The Core i3-6100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,152 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6100TE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100TE — a 47.9% clock advantage for the A10-6800K. The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6100TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Core i3-6100TE's 3,152 — a 1.1% lead for the A10-6800K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 4 MB on the Core i3-6100TE.

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i3-6100TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+63%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,186+1%	3,152
Geekbench 6 Single	477	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6100TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The Core i3-6100TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i3-6100TE
Socket	FM2	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-6800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6800K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6100TE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6800K) and HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6100TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget, Core i3-6100TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130.