Core i3-6102E
VS
Core 2 Duo T6670

Core i3-6102E vs Core 2 Duo T6670

Intel

Core i3-6102E

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T6670

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-6102E is positioned at rank 989 and the Core 2 Duo T6670 is on rank 474, so the Core 2 Duo T6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6102E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29858%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
28213%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20485%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6171%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4276%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2449%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2417%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2201%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2201%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2176%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2117%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2088%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2079%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2061%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
100%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
98%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
98%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
98%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
98%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
97%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
96%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
93%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
91%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
90%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6670

#462
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
620%
#463
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
611%
#464
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
561%
#465
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
559%
#466
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
553%
#468
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
534%
#469
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
512%
#470
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
512%
#471
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
498%
#474
Core 2 Duo T6670
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#488
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-6102E (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and LPDDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-6102ECore 2 Duo T6670
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T6670 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-6102ECore 2 Duo T6670
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-6102E and Core 2 Duo T6670

Intel

Core i3-6102E

The Core i3-6102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6670

The Core 2 Duo T6670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,365 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-6102E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo T6670's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-6102E versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6670 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T6670. The Core i3-6102E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6670 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6102E scores 2,349 against the Core 2 Duo T6670's 2,365 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6670. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6102E vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6670.

FeatureCore i3-6102ECore 2 Duo T6670
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.2 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB+300%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,349
2,365
Geekbench 6 Single
252
Geekbench 6 Multi
252
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6102E versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T6670 — the Core i3-6102E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-6102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-6102E) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T6670) — the Core i3-6102E offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-6102ECore 2 Duo T6670
Socket
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+700%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6102E) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6670). The Core i3-6102E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core 2 Duo T6670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6102E targets Embedded, Core 2 Duo T6670 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T6670 rivals Core 2 Duo T6600.

FeatureCore i3-6102ECore 2 Duo T6670
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Embedded
Budget