Core i3-6102E vs Core m7-6Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6102E vs Core m7-6Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6102E vs Core m7-6Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6102E

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $168 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 73.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Core m7-6Y75 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,349 vs 2,363).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6102E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m7-6Y75 better than Core i3-6102E?

Yes. Core m7-6Y75 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core m7-6Y75 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m7-6Y75 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m7-6Y75 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core m7-6Y75 comes in 74.7% more expensive on MSRP at $393 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-6102E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 73.6% better value on paper (10.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older DDR4-era platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m7-6Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6102E vs Core m7-6Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6102E

The Core i3-6102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $225.

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6102E and Core m7-6Y75 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-6102E versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — a 48% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75. The Core i3-6102E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6102E scores 2,349 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 0.6% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6102E vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75.

Feature	Core i3-6102E	Core m7-6Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+63%
Base Clock	—	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,349	2,363

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6102E) / not specified (Core m7-6Y75). The Core i3-6102E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6102E targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i3-6102E	Core m7-6Y75
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6102E was priced at $225, while the Core m7-6Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($225 vs $393), Core i3-6102E was $168 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6102E delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core m7-6Y75 — making the Core i3-6102E the 53.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-6102E	Core m7-6Y75
MSRP	$225-43%	$393
Performance per Dollar	10.4+73%	6.0
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Core i3-6102E on Amazon

Search Core m7-6Y75 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.