Celeron G3920 vs Core i3-6102E

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i3-6102E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i3-6102E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3920

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $185 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 464.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($40 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌104% higher power demand at 51W vs 25W.

Core i3-6102E

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 51W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,349 vs 2,358).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3920 better than Core i3-6102E?

Yes. Celeron G3920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3920 comes in $185 cheaper on MSRP at $40 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 464.7% better value on MSRP (59.0 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6102E is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i3-6102E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i3-6102E

The Core i3-6102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-6102E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-6102E — a 41.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G3920. Both are built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Core i3-6102E's 2,349 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G3920. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3920 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6102E.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i3-6102E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+53%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,358	2,349
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i3-6102E
Socket	LGA1151	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3920) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6102E). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3920) and HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6102E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget, Core i3-6102E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i3-6102E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Core i3-6102E came in at $225. On launch pricing ($40 vs $225), Celeron G3920 was $185 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-6102E — making the Celeron G3920 the 139.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i3-6102E
MSRP	$40-82%	$225
Performance per Dollar	59.0+467%	10.4
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Celeron G3920 on Amazon

Search Core i3-6102E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.