Core i3-6102E vs Pentium G4400T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6102E vs Pentium G4400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6102E vs Pentium G4400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6102E

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Pentium G4400T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 36.3 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G4400T

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $161 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 247.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.3 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,323 vs 2,349).
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6102E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6102E better than Pentium G4400T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G4400T is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6102E pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6102E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6102E is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-6102E comes in 251.6% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. Pentium G4400T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 247.7% better value on paper (36.3 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6102E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6102E vs Pentium G4400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6102E

The Core i3-6102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $225.

Pentium G4400T

The Pentium G4400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,323 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6102E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G4400T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-6102E versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G4400T — a 41.7% clock advantage for the Pentium G4400T. Both are built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-6102E scores 2,349 against the Pentium G4400T's 2,323 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-6102E. Both processors carry 3 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-6102E	Pentium G4400T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.9 GHz+53%
Base Clock	—	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,349+1%	2,323

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6102E) / not specified (Pentium G4400T). The Core i3-6102E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Pentium G4400T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6102E targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i3-6102E	Pentium G4400T
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6102E was priced at $225, while the Pentium G4400T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($225 vs $64), Pentium G4400T was $161 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6102E delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 36.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400T — making the Pentium G4400T the 110.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-6102E	Pentium G4400T
MSRP	$225	$64-72%
Performance per Dollar	10.4	36.3+249%
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Core i3-6102E on Amazon

Search Pentium G4400T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.