Core i3-7100 vs Core i3-8140U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7100 vs Core i3-8140U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7100 vs Core i3-8140U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7100

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Core i3-8140U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌240% higher power demand at 51W vs 15W.

Core i3-8140U

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 51W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,227 vs 4,306).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7100 better than Core i3-8140U?

Yes. Core i3-7100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-7100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-7100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8140U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7100 vs Core i3-8140U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7100

The Core i3-7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i3-8140U

The Core i3-8140U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2019 (6 years ago). It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,227 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7100 and Core i3-8140U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7100 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-8140U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-7100 is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-7100 scores 4,306 against the Core i3-8140U's 4,227 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i3-7100. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100 vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-8140U.

Feature	Core i3-7100	Core i3-8140U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+86%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	4,306+2%	4,227
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,225

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7100 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-8140U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-7100	Core i3-8140U
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8140U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100) and UHD Graphics 620 (Core i3-8140U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100 targets Desktop, Core i3-8140U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-8140U rivals Ryzen 3 3300U.

Feature	Core i3-7100	Core i3-8140U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	UHD Graphics 620
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Desktop	Mainstream Laptop