Core i3-7100 vs Opteron 3380
Core i3-7100
Opteron 3380
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7100 is positioned at rank 532 and the Opteron 3380 is on rank 79, so the Opteron 3380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3380
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($427) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+955%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($427) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7100 and Opteron 3380
Core i3-7100
The Core i3-7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $117.
Opteron 3380
The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7100 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3380 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3380 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7100 versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 3380 — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-7100 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3380 uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100 scores 4,306 against the Opteron 3380's 4,358 — a 1.2% lead for the Opteron 3380. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3380.
| Feature | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 8+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+50% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Delhi (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,306 | 4,358+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7100 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3380 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100) / not specified (Opteron 3380). The Core i3-7100 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-7100 launched at $117 MSRP, while the Opteron 3380 debuted at $229. At current prices ($40 vs $427), the Core i3-7100 is $387 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7100 delivers 107.7 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Opteron 3380 — making the Core i3-7100 the 165.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-49% | $229 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-91% | $427 |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.7+956% | 10.2 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-7100 and Opteron 3380
