
Core i3-7100

Opteron 4376 HE
Core i3-7100 vs Opteron 4376 HE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7100 vs Opteron 4376 HE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-7100 vs Opteron 4376 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 65W, a 14W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Opteron 4376 HE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4376 HE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,306 vs 4,318).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4376 HE, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Opteron 4376 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 4376 HE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌27.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 4376 HE better than Core i3-7100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7100 vs Opteron 4376 HE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7100
The Core i3-7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $117.

Opteron 4376 HE
The Opteron 4376 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,318 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7100 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4376 HE offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4376 HE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7100 versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 4376 HE — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-7100 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100 scores 4,306 against the Opteron 4376 HE's 4,318 — a 0.3% lead for the Opteron 4376 HE. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4376 HE.
| Feature | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 8+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+50% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Seoul (2012) |
| PassMark | 4,306 | 4,318 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7100 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | C32 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100) / not specified (Opteron 4376 HE). The Core i3-7100 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 4376 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-7100 | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















