Core i3-7100T
VS
Atom C3708

Core i3-7100T vs Atom C3708

Intel

Core i3-7100T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Atom C3708

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7100T is positioned at rank 568 and the Atom C3708 is on rank 615, so the Core i3-7100T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9693%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9159%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6650%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2003%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1587%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1388%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
795%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
785%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
714%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
714%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
706%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
687%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
678%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
675%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
669%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
100%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
100%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
99%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
98%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
98%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
97%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
97%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3708

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9977%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1884%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1674%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1293%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
100%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
99%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
96%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
96%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
95%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
94%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
94%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
94%
#615
Atom C3708
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#618
Xeon W-2133
MSRP: $617|Avg: $617
98%
#622
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
96%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
94%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-7100T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom C3708 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-7100TAtom C3708
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-7100TAtom C3708
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7100T and Atom C3708

Intel

Core i3-7100T

The Core i3-7100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,763 points. Launch price was $117.

Intel

Atom C3708

The Atom C3708 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,750 points. Launch price was $209.

Processing Power

The Core i3-7100T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3708 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3708 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100T versus 1.7 GHz on the Atom C3708 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100T (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i3-7100T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom C3708 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100T scores 3,763 against the Atom C3708's 3,750 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-7100T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100T vs 16 MB on the Atom C3708.

FeatureCore i3-7100TAtom C3708
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+100%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+100%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
16 MB+433%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
16 MB+6300%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
3,763
3,750
Geekbench 6 Single
1,157
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3708 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Atom C3708 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B250,H270,Z270 (Core i3-7100T) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3708).

FeatureCore i3-7100TAtom C3708
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
256 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100T) / not specified (Atom C3708). The Core i3-7100T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Atom C3708 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100T targets Low Power Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-7100TAtom C3708
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Low Power Desktop